Collaboration and Incivisme

The Walloon-dominated state used the word "incivisme" after the war as synonymous with collaboration, thereby implying that any attempt during the war to seize the opportunity of Belgium's defeat to pry more autonomy and linguistic rights from the reluctant hands of the Belgian state was an act of collaboration.

This, of course, is a bold distortion of history.

The Flems had no reason to remain loyal to the Belgian state since it had been forced upon them in 1830 by French-speaking revolutionaries and the ill-advised intervention of the British crown.

Shall I remind the readers that Dutch didn't gain official recognition in Belgium until 1967 even though it had always been the country's majority language?

Attempts by Flemings to secede from Belgium during the WW2 had nothing to do with love of Nazism and everything to do with the weakening of the discredited French-speaking Belgian state's authority.

The Walloons' long and disgraceful history is one of antisemitism, nationalism and socialism, whereas their more free-market capitalist Flemish neighbors have been known for times out of mind to hold their Jewish communities in high esteem. The Flemings' cultural affinities with National-Socialism have always been thin, while the Walloons accepted the victories of Hitler with enthusiasm and collaborated so convincingly that Hitler chose not to partition Belgium and refused to give full independence to the Flemings even though that would have been the logical thing for him to do since the Flemings speak a Germanic language and the Walloons a Latin-based tongue. No, the Nazis did preserve the entire state structures of Belgium, and it is no exaggeration to say that Hitler cajoled Belgium's French-speaking community, to the delight of Leopold III, the French-speaking monarch of German heritage.

Walloons Collaborated More than Flems

Belgian French-speakers collaborated in much more committed way than Belgian Dutch-speakers. Even as the Walloon-dominated state he headed was committing countless crimes against the Jews, the French-speaking king of the Belgians himself enjoyed Hitler's hospitality and friendship to the full:

As one example some of the 'attitudes' that prevailed at the time: On 13 April 1944, King Leopold III [a French native speaker] ordered Paul-Emile Janson, the Minister of Justice, and Robert De Foy, the head of the Sûreté de l'Etat, the Belgian secret service, to draw up lists of 'suspect Belgians and foreigners.' Those on the lists were to be arrested, extradited or 'placed in concentration camps' as soon as national security required. (General State Archives Brussels (GSA) microfilm 2081/1, Minutes cabinet meeting, 8 May 1940.)

The prisoners were stowed in railway wagons bound for France . One victim later recalled: 'It took our train seven days to get from Brussels to Orléans. Under a torrid heat, locked up with 40 people, including women and children, in a hermetically sealed wagon where we had to stay day and night, we suffered from hunger, a lack of air and especially from thirst. We were left for 43 hours without receiving even a drop of water. We were submitted to the brutality of the soldier? accompanying the escort and in many stations we were almost lynched by citizens who had been led to believe that we were parachutists and spies. Many people died en route. (Quoted in J.Gérard-Libois and J.Gotovitch, L'An 40: La Belgique occupée. Brussels : CRISP, 1971, p.114.)

Those who arrived in the South of France were rounded up in Franco-Belgian concentration camps. A German report written three months later states that in Antwerp alone 3,000 suspects were arrested. The majority of them were Jews, about 400 were (non-Jewish) German citizens and 50 were Flemish-Nationalists. Many prominent Flamingants were gaoled, including the former Aktivist leader August Borms. (German Records of Alexandria, 501/102, Wehrmacht Administration Activity Report nr. 7, 4 Aug. 1940, p. 49.)
Late on the evening of 20 May, the first German Panzers rolled into Abbeville at the Franco-Belgian border. French soldiers immediately massacred 21 Belgian prisoners that had not been expatriated yet, including the Canadian, the Dutch grandmother, a German Catholic monk, a Hungarian Jew, a Czech Jew, a Communist Brussels town councillor and the Flemish politician George Van Severen and his deputy. Most were shot, but others, including the grandmother, were savagely stabbed to death with bayonets.

Thousands of civilians imprisoned by the Belgian authorities in France were released by the Germans in the course of the following weeks, including a large number of Jews. They were the only Jews ever liberated by Hitler's army. The Wehrmacht allowed them to return to Belgium . However, 3,537 Jews who had entered Belgium from abroad were kept imprisoned and send to murdered in Auschwitz. They were the only Auschwitz victims who had been arrested on the order of a Western government.

After the war, the Belgian authorities refused to investigate the matter of the deportations. (Nor did anyone ever investigated ,a story worthy in itself , how and on whose orders the Belgian secret service had assisted Heydrich before the war.) Belgium never apologized for what happened, it even refused to repatriate the bodies of the 21 victims in Abbeville. Unlike Cardinal Verdier of Paris , the Belgian Cardinal Van Roey never protested against the persecution of the Jews . Worse, he disbanded the Katholiek Bureau voor Israel , an Antwerp Catholic organisation that tried to help the fugitives. (Max Vanden Berg to Mgr. Kerkhofs, 21 Sept. 1942, in Maxim Steinberg , L'Etoile et le fusil: La traque des juifs, 1942-1944, Brussels,1986. vol. II, p. 201.)

In a later letter to Adolf Hitler Leopold’s wife, Lilian in fact wrote that Leopold was “loyal to the Führer.” (Albert De Jonghe, De laatste boodschap van Kiewitz namens koning Leopold III voor Hitler, 15 juni 1944; Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Filologie en Geschiedenis, LXV, 2 ,1987, pp. 274-300. pp. 299-300.)

On 19 November, King Leopold was received on the Obersalzberg. Hitler pampered his guest. The Gestapo even provided call-girls. According to Leopold, the very first thing the Führer said when he welcomed him was: 'I have a very great respect for you and for your dynasty, because your father has always treated Germany justly.' (Leopold III to Willequet, 22 Nov. 1976, in J. Willequet Albert Ie", Roi des Belges: Un portrait politique et humain. Brussels , 1979., p. 172.) source

After the war, the Frog-speaking king didn't face execution or even jail although he had collaborated with Adolf Hitler way more closely than any Fleming ever had.

The truth is that the Flems never managed to suck Nazi cock nearly as brilliantly as the Wallunatics did during WWII. Take for instance Leon Degrelle:

Severely wounded at Cherkasy in 1944, Degrelle steadily climbed in the Schutzstaffel hierarchy after the inclusion of Walloons in the Waffen-SS, being made a SS-Obersturmbannführer in the early months of 1945. He received the Ritterkreuz, a unique distinction for a foreigner, from Hitler's hands (he later claimed Hitler told him "if I had a son, I wish he'd resemble you").source

Of course, Walloon collaborators, just like their beloved French-speaking king of German ancestry, got scot-free after the war, and very few of them faced a tribunal. However, the Nazi Walloons seized the opportunity of war's end to massacre and harass many Flems who had never collaborated in any way with the German authorities, just because they spoke Dutch rather than French. Degrelle, in contrast, remained free, "would frequently appear in public, and in private meetings in a white uniform featuring his Waffen SS decorations, while expressing his pride over his close contacts and "thinking bond" with Adolf Hitler" and died in his bed at the venerable age of 87:

[Degrelle's] total escape of repression and trial stands in stark contrast to the repression forced on collaborators in the Flemish part of Belgium after the war.
ibidem

The Vlaams Belang is committed to rehabilitating the memory of all those Flemings who were unjustly decried as collaborateurs or "stormtroopers" as a pretext to kill or harass them after the war. Said harassment and persecutions lasted for decades after the end of WWII, while Walloon collaborateurs, more often than not, led successful careers within Belgian state structures.

Belgium was not denazified after WWII. Like in Germany and France, most Nazis and collaborateurs stayed in office, and many fascist laws were not abrogated.

Belgium, France and Germany never stopped conducting pro-Arab and anti-Jewish foreign policies after WWII. They are covert Nazi states that must be dismantled right now, and so must their political construct from hell, the European Union!

French Demography Driven by Muslims

To extrapolate from TFR's found in the Third-World to the TFR's of immigrant communities in France is an amateurish, albeit common mistake, as immigrants to France from several countries tend to have TFR's above those found in their countries of origin:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_France

**** Average number******Average number
**** of children in**** of children in
**** France (1991-1998)**country of origin(1990-1999)

Portugal*****1.96**** 1.49
Tunisia******2.90**** 2.73
Turkey*******3.21**** 1.92


It is obvious in such cases that those immigrant communities are using the system to beget larger families than they would be able to afford back in the old country.

Those who think Muslim fertility will dwindle to native levels are assuming them to be overwhelmingly willing to adopt our culture, an assumption disproved by observation: second and third-generation immigrants often are even more religious than their parents, and a Muslim revival can be observed in all European countries including France. Another factor to be considered is education: in virtually every country on earth, highly educated women are far less fertile than women with little education. France being no exception to the rule, in spite of expensive family policies, non-indigenous women will remain more fertile than their indigenous counterparts until they achieve comparable educational levels, something they can only accomplish over a long period of time.

All this means that French Muslim fertility may continue declining, but will remain above indigenous fertility for long decades to come.

Diminishing Muslim fertility around the world will not prevent Muslims from eventually overtaking native Europeans in numbers: it will be many years before global Muslim fertility reaches sub-replacement level, and by the time it does our native populations will have long dwindled to a minority or near-minority due to the combined effect of higher Muslim fertility and strong immigration from Muslim countries. In 18 years, Middle-Easterners still won't be at sub-replacement level:


"The Arab countries, plus Turkey, Iran and Israel which make up a large group of states with a combined population of over 400 millions in 2000, were until very recently experiencing explosive demographic growth. (...) The projections for the region as a whole are that the Total Fertility Rate will fall from 3.00 in 2000 to 2.08 by 2025." http://cahier_youssef_courbage.site.ined.fr/en



18 years from now Middle-Eastern, and certainly black African, TFR will still far exceed indigenous French TFR (unless the latter rises from current levels, a prospect that no data we have suggests. Actually, a further decline of indigenous fertility may very well occur).

On a global level, Muslim fertility will be staying ahead of ours for as long as we can foresee:



Right now, foreign-born women account for 20 percent of French births, even though foreign-born immigrants are only about 8 percent (4.9 millions) of the total population, and that's not even taking into account the millions of second and third-generation immigrant women and black women from overseas territories born in France, for whom we have no statistics, but who are even more numerous than foreign-born immigrant women. So what percentage of children are born in France to non-European French mothers every year right now? Anywhere between 35-50%, so guess who's benefiting from France's generous family policies.


And last but not least, to think Muslims will need to constitute an absolute majority of the population to seize power in France is overly optimistic, given their demonstrated ability to wage protracted Intifada-type wars on the French state with a mere 10 percent share of the population.

Unless France reacts soon, it is a doomed country.

More on this here:

Fertility of France, the Manipulation Continues

Sunday, January 28th, 2007 in Europe, France, News, Politics, Propaganda, Society, War

The French merdias recently announced that according to the INSEE (National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies) French women had a total fertility rate of 2. Since then, all the French establishment is congratulating itself for France’s great performance and celebrating the super fecund French woman.

However, beside the Front National, nobody realized that 2 is not enough to reach the replacement fertility rate, and moreover that the number announced by the INSEE and the merdias do not represent the fertility of French women, but the fertility of the women in France.

One have to research elsewhere than in the INSEE’s statistics to find out, for instance, that the most fertile department is Seine-Saint-Denis, and that in this department 40% of births are from foreign mothers.

The true demographic balance is that ethnic French population is being substituted.

As said Mohamed BEN BRAHIM BOUKHAROUBA, a former president of Algeria, in a U.N. speech in 1974: “One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”

http://guillotine.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/fertility-of-france-the-manipulation-continue

France, Birthplace of Terrorism

The French revolution gave birth to leftism, which immediately invented terrorism as a system of government. Since then the French left (which is pretty much every Frenchman these days) has never really disavowed terrorism. They ARE America-haters and terrorists themselves, only without the guts to blow themselves to bits in the middle of a crowded marketplace.

A number of the French bashers on this board are making the same mistake that America repeatedly has in its more than two-century history, blindly believing that the French are worth being friends with.

The sad truth is that the French will backstab anyone for convenience.

Those traitors rank below even the Muslims in my esteem.

For traitors they have proved themselves to be, to both the West and Christendom.


Fuck France!